HOW TO CREATE A QUALITY DIGITAL MODEL THROUGH EXTRAORAL SCANNING – A NARRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW

Dobromira Shopova; Diyana Zhelyazkova

doi:10.35120/medisij030425s

Authors

Dobromira Shopova Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Diyana Zhelyazkova Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij030425s

Keywords:

digital dentistry, digital model, extraoral scanning, accuracy

Abstract

This literature review explores methods for creating high-quality digital models through extraoral scanning, drawing on current scientific and practical literature. It analyzes key factors that affect the quality of digital impressions, including the technical characteristics of scanners and the use of various types of elastomeric impression materials, as well as different extraoral scanning techniques. The main challenges associated with the accuracy and precision of digital models, along with their applicability in dentistry, are also discussed. The review concludes by emphasizing the importance of best practices and technological innovation in scanning to achieve optimal results

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apinsathanon, P., Bhattarai, B. P., Suphangul, S., Wongsirichat, N., & Aimjirakul, N. (2022). Penetration and tensile strength of various impression materials of vinylsiloxanether, polyether, and polyvinylsiloxane impression materials. European journal of dentistry, 16(02), 339-345.

Bud, Eugen S., et al. (2022). Extra-Oral three-dimensional (3D) scanning evaluation of three different impression materials—an in vitro study. Polymers 14.17 (2022): 3678.

Camardella, Leonardo Tavares, et al. (2016). Effect of polyvinylsiloxane material and impression handling on the accuracy of digital models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 149.5 (2016): 634-644.

Chen, S. Y., Liang, W. M., & Chen, F. N. (2004). Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. Journal of dentistry, 32(8), 603-609.

Ellakany, P., et al. (2022). Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral dental scanners with different CAD/CAM scanning technologies: an in vitro study. Journal of Prosthodontics 31.4 (2022): 314-319.

Emir, Faruk, and Simel Ayyıldız. "Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis." journal of prosthodontic research 63.4 (2019): 434-439.

Endo, T., & Finger, W. J. (2006). Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence International, 37(1).

Gao, H. et al. (2022). Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 128.5 (2022): 1001-1008.

Gowri, S., Shenoy, V., & Kannan, S. (2015). Evaluation of effectiveness of intraoral delivery tip on single step impressions using monophase and two-phase impression materials: An: in vivo: study. Journal of Oral Research and Review, 7(1), 1-5.

Jeon, J., et al. (2015). Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white-and blue-light scanners. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 114.4 (2015): 549-553.

Johnson, G.H. & Craig, R.G. (1986). Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 55.2 (1986): 197-203.

Joshi, P. R., Bhrat, G. S., & Shrenoy, V. (2009). Comparative Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy of Addition Silicone and Condensation Silicone Impression Materials-An in-vitro Study. Malaysian dental journal, 30(1).

Kissov, Ch. Dental materials for dentists. (2019). Sofia, Bulgaria.

Kontis, P., et al. (2021). Accuracy of intraoral scans of edentulous jaws with different generations of intraoral scanners compared to laboratory scans. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 13.5 (2021): 316.

Labib, M.A., El-Beialy, A.R. & Attia, K.H. (2020). Evaluation of the accuracy of digital models obtained using intraoral and extraoral scanners versus gold standard plaster model (diagnostic accuracy study). Open Journal of Medical Imaging 10.03 (2020): 151.

Martins, F., et al. (2019). Dimensional stability of a preliminary vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Dentistry Journal 7.3 (2019): 81.

Matta, R.E., Adler, W., Wichmann, M., Heckmann, S.M. (2017). Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 117(4):507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.026.

Naumovski, B., & Kapushevska, B. (2017). Dimensional stability and accuracy of silicone–based impression materials using different impression techniques–a literature review. Prilozi 38.2 (2017): 131-138.

O'Brien, W. J. (2002). Dental materials and their selection, 2002. Quintessence.

Persson, Anna SK, et al. (2009). Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dental materials 25.7 (2009): 929-936.

Runkel, C., et al. (2020). Digital impressions in dentistry—accuracy of impression digitalisation by desktop scanners. Clinical oral investigations 24 (2020): 1249-1257.

Shopova, D., Yordanova, M., & Yordanova, S. (2020). The Digital Impression As An Initial Unit Of Modern Dental Medicine-Literature Review. Knowledge-International Journal, 38(4), 797-801.

Sinobad, T., et al. (2014). The effect of disinfectants on dimensional stability of addition and condensation silicone impressions. Vojnosanitetski pregled 71.3 (2014).

Tomova, Z., Chonin, A., Stoeva, I., & Vlahova, A. (2023). Clinical and laboratory study of corrosion resistance of a base dental alloy for selective laser melting. Folia Medica, 65(4), 664-670.

Tomova, Z., Zhekov, Y., & Vlahova, A. (2024). Repair of fractured metal-ceramic restoration using CAD/CAM technologies. Case report. Folia Medica, 66(3), 431-435.

Tomova, Z., Zhekov, Y., Alexandrov, G., Vlahova, A., & Vasileva, E. (2023). Application of CAD/CAM technologies and materials for prosthetic restoration of severely damaged teeth—Clinical cases. Australian dental journal, 68(4), 294-302.

Varvara, G., Murmura, G., Sinjari, B., Cardelli, P., & Caputi, S. (2015). Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2-phase, and 3-phase impression techniques: An in vitro study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 113(2), 108-113.

Wadhwani, C. P., Johnson, G. H., Lepe, X., & Raigrodski, A. J. (2005). Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 93(6), 530-539.