DIAGNOSTIC CONTRIBUTION OF CLOSED NEEDLE PLEURAL BIOPSY – A 10-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij010311bKeywords:
closed pleural biopsy, blind pleural biopsy, tuberculous pleural effusion, ignant pleural effusion, diagnostic contributionAbstract
Determining the etiology of a pleural effusion can present a major problem for the clinician. Diagnostic evaluation of pleural effusions should include relevant history, clinical course, radiographic abnormalities, and take into account the patient's desire and consent for further invasive investigations. The seventies were dominated by specific pleural effusions, but in the last three decades effusions of malignant etiology have dominated. Despite advances in diagnostics, about 20% of pleural effusions remain etiologically unexplained. Objective: we present data on the diagnostic contribution and complications when using a Ramel‘s needle (Wolf's set) in investigating the nature of pleural effusions from an etiopathogenetic aspect. Methods: This retrospective study included 284 transparietal closed pleural biopsies performed between January 2011 and December 2020. Local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine was applied to the skin and subcutaneous tissue in all subjects (premedication with 1 mg of atropine or 10 mg of apaurin was sporadically applied); a chest radiograph was taken immediately before and within 4 to 12 hours after the procedure to rule out complications. The diagnostic positivity, accuracy and complication rate of the technique were evaluated. Results: 175 men and 109 women (median age 60 years, range 19–88) underwent transparietal pleural biopsy with a Ramel‘s needle, 96% of pleural effusions were unilateral (53% in the right hemithorax). Pleural tissue was obtained in 98%. The most common histological diagnosis included: malignancy (34.7%), nonspecific inflammation and mesothelial hyperplasia (32.3%), chronic inflammation with fibrosis (23.5%), granulomatous disease (4.3%), normal pleura and striated muscle (5.2%). Microbiological examination was performed in 24 samples (8.4%): Mycobacterium tuberculosis was present in 1 case, Escherichia Coli in one and Candida albicans in another patient. No pathogenic bacteria or fungi were identified in the rest of the examined. The procedure was well tolerated. Complications occurred in 7 (2.4%): pneumothorax in 4 patients (1.4%), vasovagal reaction in 2 cases (0.7%), local hematoma (0.3%). Conclusion: closed (percutaneous, blind) pleural biopsy with a Ramel‘s needle appears to be a simple technique, well tolerated, with a low complication rate and high diagnostic efficiency. Closed pleural biopsy has a relatively high sensitivity in the diagnosis of exudative pleural fluid, especially in tuberculous pleurisy and may provide an alternative technique in clinical practice. It can be applied to any unexplained pleural effusion, in cooperative patients with no coagulation abnormalities, in relation to standard biochemical, microbiological and cytological investigations, especially in hospital units without thoracoscopy. In our series, nonspecific inflammation was the most common histological diagnosis, and repeated biopsies significantly increased the diagnostic contribution.Downloads
References
Abram’s LD. (1958). A pleural biopsy punch. Lancet. 1:30–1
Báez-Saldaña R, Rumbo-Nava U, Escobar-Rojas A, et al. (2017). Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. J Bras Pneumol ;43:424-30
Bloomberg AE (1970). Thoracoscopy in diagnosis of pleural effusion. NY State J Med; 70(15): 1974−7.
Bueno CE, Clemente MG, Castro BC, Martin LM, Ramos SR, Panizo AG. (1990). Cytologic and bacteriologic analysis of fluid and pleural biopsy specimens with Cope’s needle.Study of 414 patients. Arch Intern Med;150:1190–4.
Canto A, Rivas J, Saumench J. Points to consider when choosing a biopsy method in cases of pleurisy of unknown origin Chest 1983;84(2):776−9.
Chakrabarti B, Ryland I, Sheard J, et al. The role of Abrams percutaneous pleural biopsy in the investigation of exudative pleural effusions. Chest 2006;129:1549-55.
Chang DB, Yang PC, Luh KT, Kuo SH, Yu CJ. (1991). Ultrasound guided pleural biopsy with Tru-cut needle. Chest;100:1328–33.
Cope C. (1958). New pleural biopsy needle. JAMA. 167:1107–8.
Darooei R, Sanadgol G, Gh-Nataj A, et al. (2017). Discriminating Tuberculous Pleural Effusion from Malignant Pleural Effusion Based on Routine. Pleural Fluid Biomarkers Using Mathematical Methods . Tanaffos ;16:157-65.
DeCamp PT, Moseley PW, Scott ML. (1973). Diagnostic thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg; 16(1): 79−84,
DeFrancis N, Kloske E, Albano E. (1955). Needle biopsy of the parietal pleura-preliminary report. N Eng J Med.; 252:948–9
Delfs-Jegge S, Dalquen P, Hurwitz N. (1994). Cytomegalovirus-infected cells in a pleural effusion from an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patient.A case report. Acta Cytol. ;38:70–2.
Fisk M, Branley H. Pleural effusion. (2013). Br J Hosp Med (Lond);74:C50-4.
Haridas N, Suraj KP, Rajagopal TP, et al. (2014). Medical Thoracoscopy vs Closed Pleural Biopsy in Pleural Effusions: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Clin Diagn Res
Hooper C, Lee YC, Maskell N (2010). Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax ;65 Suppl 2:4-17.
Jacobeus HC. (1990). Uber die Moglich die Zystoskopie bei Untersuchung seroser Hohlungen azuwenden. Munch Med Wochenchr 57: 2090−2
Jain NK, Guhan AR, Joshi N, Dixit R, Singh V, Meena RP. (2000). Comparative study of visceral and parietal pleural biopsy in the etiological diagnosis of pleural diseases.J Assoc Physicians India.48:776–80
Kirsch CM, Kroe DM, Azzi RL, Jensen WA, Kagawa FT, Wehner JH. (1997). The optimal number of pleural biopsy specimens for a diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Chest. ;112:702–6
Levine H, Metzger W, Lacera D, Kay L. (1970). Diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy by culture of pleural biopsy specimen. Arch Intern Med. ;126:269–71.
Light RW. (1997). Diagnostic principles in pleural diseases. Eur Respir J. ;10:476–81.
Maturu VN, Dhooria S, Bal A, et al. (2015). Role of medical thoracoscopy and closed-blind pleural biopsy in undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a single-center experience of 348 patients. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol ;22:121-9.
McDonald CM, Pierre C, de Perrot M, et al. (2018). Efficacy and Cost of Awake Thoracoscopy and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion. Ann Thorac Surg ;106:361-7
McLeod DT, Ternouth I, Nkanza N. (1989). Comparison of the Tru-cut biopsy needle with the Abram’s punch for pleural biopsy. Thorax. ;44:794–6.
Nelson Morrone, Ph.D.; Eduardo Algranti, M.Sc.; and Elci Barreto, M.D. (2015). Thoracoscopy, with its high level of diagnostic accuracy, is recognized as the gold standard for diagnosing pleural lesions (Dixon G, de Fonseka D, Maskell N. Pleural controversies: image guided biopsy vs. thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusions? J Thorac Dis ;7:1041-51
Ogirala RG, Agarwal V, Aldrich TK. (1989). Raja pleural biopsy needle.A comparison with the Abrams needle in experimental pleural effusion. Am Rev Respir Dis. ;139:984–7.
Plavec G, Dangubić V, Tatić V. (1987). Percutaneous needle pleural biopsy. Vojnosanit Pregl; 44(3): 206−8
Plavec G. Mrdja V. Mirović V. Ninković M. (1996 June). Direct bacilloscopy and Lowenstein cultures in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. In: Zbornik sažetaka 1996. Days of microbiologists of Yugoslavia; 12-15; Herceg Novi. 1996 BC 28)
Plavec G. (1996). Diagnostic significance of tumor markers in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions, [doctoral dissertation]. Belgrade: Military Medical Academy; 46−7
Poe RH, Israel RH, Utell MJ, Hall WJ, Greenblatt DW, Kallay MC, et al. (1984). Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of closed pleural biopsy. Arch Intern Med. 144:325–8.
Prabhudesai PP, Mahasur AA, Murudkar SN, Ajay R. (1992). Percutaneous visceral pleural biopsy with fenestrated cup biopsy forceps. Thorax. 47:753–4
Rodriguez-Panadaro F, Narawo FB, Mejias JL. (1989). Pleural metastatic tumors and effusions. Frequency and pathogenic mechanism in post-mortem series. Eur Respir J, 2(4): 366.
Sharma SK, Suresh V, Mohan A, Kaur P, Saha P, Kumar A, Pande JN. A (2001). Prospective study of sensitivity and specificity of adenosine deaminase estimation in the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusion. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci., 43:149–55.
Son HS, Lee SH, Darlong LM, et al. (2014). Is There a Role for a Needle Thoracoscopic Pleural Biopsy under Local Anesthesia for Pleural Effusions? Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 47:124-8.
Thomas M, Ibrahim WH, Raza T, et al. (2017). Medical thoracoscopy for exudative pleural effusion: an eight-year experience from a country with a young population. BMC Pulm Med ;17:151.
Tianli Zhang, Bing Wan, Li Wang, Chuling Li, Yangyang Xu, Xiangdong Wang, Hongbing Liu, Yong Song, Dang Lin, Ping Zhan, and Tangfeng Lv. (2020 Apr). The diagnostic yield of closed needle pleural biopsy in exudative pleural effusion: a retrospective 10-year study. Ann Transl Med. ; 8 (7): 491
Uthaman B, Behbehani N, Abal A, Madda J, Khan S. (2004). Percutaneous multiple-site parietal pleural biopsy - Description and evaluation of a new and safe technique. Chest. ;125:1776–82.
Valdes L, Alvarez D, San Jose E, Penela P, Valle JM, Garcia Pazos JM, et al. (1998). Tuberculous pleurisy: A study of 254 patients. Arch Intern Med. ;158:2017–21
Valdez-López HG, Cano-Rodríguez AI, Montemayor-Chapa M, et al. (2018). Diagnostic rentability of close pleural biopsy: Tru-cut vs. Cope. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ;56:12-7.
Yokoyama T, Toda R, Tomioka R, Aizawa H. (2009). Medical Thoracoscopy Performed Using a Flexible Bronchoscope Inserted through a Chest Tube under Local Anesthesia. Diagn Ther Endosc
Yuxin Zhang, Jiaxin Tang, Xinghua Zhou, Dazhi Zhou, Jinlin Wang and Qing Tang. (2018 Jun); Ultrasound-guided pleural cutting needle biopsy: accuracy and factors influencing diagnostic yield. J Thorac Dis. 10(6): 3244–3252.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
