ELEVATED MATERNAL BMI AMONG WOMEN WITH SUCCESSFUL VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN: EXPERIENCE FROM A 9-YEAR SINGLE-CENTER SERIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij0503109sKeywords:
TOLAC, VBAC, body mass index, obesity, overweight, cesarean deliveryAbstract
Maternal obesity is commonly associated with a reduced probability of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), yet body mass index (BMI) alone does not determine the outcome of a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). This study describes the BMI profile of women who achieved VBAC in a tertiary referral center, with particular attention to the representation of overweight and obesity among successful cases.
Objective: To describe the distribution of maternal BMI among successful VBAC cases and to assess the representation of elevated BMI, including severe obesity, within this group.
Materials and methods: A retrospective descriptive case series included 149 successful VBAC deliveries recorded between 2016 and 2025 at the University Hospital “Maichin Dom”, Sofia. BMI was documented in 118 women. Patients were grouped as BMI <25 kg/m², 25.0–29.9 kg/m² and ≥30 kg/m². Obesity was additionally stratified into classes I, II and III. The study describes the characteristics of women who achieved VBAC and does not compare them with women who had a failed TOLAC.
Results: Mean BMI was 28.3 ± 6.6 kg/m² (range 19.0–64.0). Normal BMI was present in 43/118 women (36.4%), overweight in 37/118 (31.4%) and obesity in 38/118 (32.2%). Consequently, 75/118 successful VBAC cases (63.6%) occurred in women with BMI ≥25 kg/m². Among women with obesity, 26 (68.4%) had class I, 7 (18.4%) class II and 5 (13.2%) class III obesity.
Conclusion: Elevated BMI was common rather than exceptional among women who achieved VBAC in this series. Successful vaginal birth was observed across a wide BMI range, including BMI ≥40 kg/m². These findings should not be interpreted as BMI-specific TOLAC success rates, but they illustrate why BMI is better used as one component of individualized counseling than as a stand-alone exclusion criterion.
Downloads
References
Barnea, E. R., Ramasauskaite, D., Ubom, A. E., et al. (2025). FIGO good practice recommendations for vaginal birth after cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 171(1), 17–31.
Bashirudin, S. B., Omar, S. Z., Gan, F., Hamdan, M., & Tan, P. C. (2023). Induction of labor after one previous cesarean: Predictors of vaginal birth. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X, 20, 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100249
Deng, B., Li, Y., Chen, J. Y., Guo, J., Tan, J., Yang, Y., & Liu, N. (2022). Prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 135, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104359
Deshmukh, U., Denoble, A. E., & Son, M. (2024). Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: An expert review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 230(3S), S783–S803.
Durnwald, C. P., Ehrenberg, H. M., & Mercer, B. M. (2004). The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 191(3), 954–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.051
Gray, E., Brown, M. M., Woolcott, C. G., Fahey, J., Allen, V. M., Scott, H. M., Lisonkova, S., & Mehrabadi, A. (2026). Disparities in planned and successful vaginal delivery after a cesarean delivery by body mass index: A population-based cohort study. AJOG Global Reports, 6(1), 100595.
Grobman, W. A., Sandoval, G., Rice, M. M., et al. (2021). Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: A calculator without race and ethnicity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 225(6), 664.e1–664.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.021
Hautakangas, T., Uotila, J., Kontiainen, J., Huhtala, H., & Palomäki, O. (2022). Impact of obesity on uterine contractile activity during labour: A blinded analysis of a randomised controlled trial cohort. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 129(10), 1790–1797. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17128
Hibbard, J. U., Gilbert, S., Landon, M. B., et al. (2006). Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31
Jévitt, C. M. (2020). Management of labor and delivery to reduce risk for cesarean birth in women with obesity. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 65(3), 391–397.
Jude, G., Fain, A., Raker, C., Rubenstein, S., Bicocca, M., Wagner, S., & Gupta, M. (2024). The association between trial of labor after cesarean in obese patients and adverse maternal outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 309(6), 2421–2426.
Lee, M., Almeida, T. C., Saade, G., & Kawakita, T. (2024). Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean delivery in individuals with morbid obesity after previous cesarean delivery. American Journal of Perinatology, 41(14), 1980–1989.
Norman, S. M., Tuuli, M. G., Odibo, A. O., Caughey, A. B., Roehl, K. A., & Cahill, A. G. (2012). The effects of obesity on the first stage of labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 120(1), 130–135.
Vahratian, A., Zhang, J., Troendle, J. F., Savitz, D. A., & Siega-Riz, A. M. (2004). Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 104(5 Pt 1), 943–951.
Wu, Y., Kataria, Y., Wang, Z., Ming, W. K., & Ellervik, C. (2019). Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19, 360.
Zhang, J., Bricker, L., Wray, S., & Quenby, S. (2007). Poor uterine contractility in obese women. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114(3), 343–348.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
