CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF TRANSVERSE CHANGES IN FRONTO-ORBITAL AND ZYGOMATIC WIDTH BEFORE AND AFTER RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION IN PATIENTS WITH UNILATERAL POSTERIOR CROSSBITE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij0503119kKeywords:
rapid maxillary expansion, unilateral posterior crossbite, posteroanterior cephalometry, zygomatic width, frontozygomatic regionAbstract
Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is commonly used for the correction of transverse maxillary deficiency associated with posterior crossbite. Although its primary effect is directed toward the maxilla and the midpalatal suture, expansion forces may also induce measurable changes in the circummaxillary and zygomatic regions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate transverse changes in the zygomatic and frontozygomatic regions following RME in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite using posteroanterior cephalometric measurements. A three-year prospective clinical study included 47 patients with clinically diagnosed unilateral posterior crossbite and incomplete craniofacial growth, all treated with a tooth-borne Hyrax rapid maxillary expander. The sample consisted of 18 males (38.3%) and 29 females (61.7%), with a mean age of 16.59 ± 1.89 years. Digital posteroanterior cephalograms were obtained at the diagnostic stage and immediately before removal of the RME appliance. Zygomatic width was assessed as the linear distance between the bilateral Za landmarks (Za–Za), while the transverse dimension of the frontozygomatic region was evaluated as the distance between the bilateral Zmf landmarks (Zmf–Zmf). Pre- and post-treatment values were compared using a paired-samples t-test, and the relationship between the changes in the two parameters was assessed by Pearson correlation analysis. Mean Za–Za increased from 112.91 ± 12.52 mm before RME to 114.42 ± 12.43 mm after treatment, corresponding to a mean increase of 1.51 mm (p < 0.001). Mean Zmf–Zmf increased from 85.71 ± 10.73 mm to 86.62 ± 10.98 mm, with a mean change of 0.91 mm (p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between the changes in Za–Za and Zmf–Zmf (r = 0.582, p < 0.001). The findings indicate that tooth-borne RME with a Hyrax appliance in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite is associated with statistically significant transverse changes not only in zygomatic width but also in the frontozygomatic region. These results suggest that the effects of conventional RME may extend beyond the immediate maxillary structures and may involve measurable, although limited, adaptation of more lateral and cranially located components of the midfacial complex.
Downloads
References
Ahmida, A., Mehta, S., Amelemah, E., Bashir, R., Vich, M. L., Tadinada, A., Allareddy, V., & Yadav, S. (2023). Short-term and long-term effects of miniscrew-assisted and conventional rapid palatal expansion on the cranial and circummaxillary sutures. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 163(4), e115–e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.01.007
Alan, A., Kaya, Y., & Sancak, K. (2025). Mid-facial skeletal and soft tissue changes after maxillary skeletal expander application: A retrospective CBCT study. BMC Oral Health, 25(1), 1168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06569-z
Cobourne, M. T., & DiBiase, A. T. (2025). Handbook of orthodontics (3rd ed.). Elsevier.
Corel Corporation. (2026). CorelDRAW® Graphics Suite 2026. https://www.coreldraw.com/en/product/coreldraw/
Ghoneima, A., Abdel-Fattah, E., Hartsfield, J., El-Bedwehi, A., Kamel, A., & Kula, K. (2011). Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the cranial and circummaxillary sutures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 140(4), 510–519. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.024
Gokturk, M., & Yavan, M. A. (2024). Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 85, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x
Krasteva, S. (2019). Graphical and analytical analysis of transverse deviations during movement of the lower jaw (2nd expanded ed.). MU-Plovdiv.
Kumar, S. A., Gurunathan, D., Muruganandham, & Sharma, S. (2011). Rapid maxillary expansion: A unique treatment modality in dentistry. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research,5(4),906–911. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1449
Leonardi, R., Sicurezza, E., Cutrera, A., & Barbato, E. (2011). Early post-treatment changes of circumaxillary sutures in young patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion. The Angle Orthodontist, 81(1), 36–41. doi: 10.2319/050910-250.1
Ok, U., Kayalar, E., & Sadry, S. (2023). Three-dimensional zygomatic changes after rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 84(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00348-5
Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., Larson, B. E., & Sarver, D. M. (2019). Contemporary orthodontics (6th ed.). Elsevier.- 208-240;430
Ricketts, R. M. (1981). Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod., 51(2), 115–150. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0115:PITCAO>2.0.CO;2.
Sayar, G., & Kılınç, D. D. (2019). Rapid maxillary expansion outcomes according to midpalatal suture maturation levels. Prog Orthod., 20, 27. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0278-9.
Stoilova-Todorova, M. (2018). Rapid maxillary expansion for correction of maxillary transverse insufficiency [Candidate dissertation]. Plovdiv.
Yazdan Özen, G., & Ceylan, İ. (2026). Investigation of the effects of tooth-borne, tooth-bone-borne and bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion appliances on the nasomaxillary complex using CBCT. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 39(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2026.2025.25
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
