EPISIOTOMY – TRENDS AND PREVALENCE IN HEALTH CENTER VRANJE FOR THE PERIOD 1996 – 2021. YEAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij010109jKeywords:
pregnancy, childbirth, episiotomy, parityAbstract
With this paper, we wanted to determine the prevalence of episiotomy in the completion of childbirth in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the General Hospital in Vranje in the twenty-five-year period (1996-2021), and this is the period since it is recommended to abandon routine episiotomy. We also wanted to compare the obtained results with the results of similar studies by other authors and thus determine whether the general trend of reduced use of this obstetric operation due to the numerous complications that its use causes, exists in our country. Retrospective analysis includes data obtained from birth protocols with special reference to patients born vaginally and their parity. Childbirth completed using a vacuum extractor and caesarean section were analyzed separately. Such births for the first and last year of the examined period were presented and analyzed (1996, 2021). Aggregate data for both years were also analyzed. The obtained results are expressed numerically and presented using tables. Based on the data, it was concluded that the total number of births decreased, that the number of cesarean sections increased, that episiotomy in vaginal delivery was the most common among primiparous women and that episiotomy was significantly higher in our sample than in other studies.
Downloads
References
Amorim, M.M., Coutinho, I.C., Melo, I. & Katz, L. (2017). Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial, Reproductive Health 14, 55.
Amorim, M.M., Franca- Neto, A.H., Leal, N.V., Melo, F.O., Maia, S. B. & Alves, J.N. (2014). Is It Possible to Never Perform Episiotomy During Vaginal Delivery? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 123 Suppl 1, 38S.
Carroli, G. & Mignini, L. (2009). Episiotomy for vaginal birth, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 21(1), CD000081. Doi: 10.1002/1465185.
Dinulović, D. i sar. (1996). Normalan porođaj-Partus, Opstetricija, Službeni list SRЈ, Beograd, 330-339.
Graham, I.D., & Graham, D.F. (1997). Episiotomy counts: trends and prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994, Birth, 24(3), 141-7.
Harrison, R.F., Brennan, M., & North P.M. (1984). Is routine episiotomy necessary? British Medical Journal, 288, 1971-1975.
Henriksen, T.B., Bek, K.M., Hedegaard, M., & Seacher, N.J. (1992). Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal deliveries, Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 99(12), 950-4.
Janjić, J. M., (2010), Mesto carskog reza u vođenju porođaja sa posebnim osvrtom na blizanačke trudnoće, U: Zbornik radova 54. Ginekološko akušerska nedelja. Beograd, 298-303.
Jiang, H., Qian, X., Carroli, G. & Garner, P. (2017). Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8,2(2):CD000081.
Kalis, V.,Laine,J.,W de Leew, J., Ismail K.M. & Tincello, D.G.(2012). Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 119(5), 522-526.
Lede, R.L., Belizan, J.M., & Carroli, G. (1996). Is routine use of episiotomy justified? Am J.Obstet Gynecol, 174(5),1399-402.
Rodriguez, A., Arenas, E.A., Osorio, A.L, Mendez, O. & Zuleta, J. J. (2008). Selective vs routine midline episiotomy for the prevention of third - or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 198(3), 285.
Schantz, C., Kruy Leang S. et al. (2015). Reasons for routine episiotomy. Reproductive health matters, 23(45), 68-77.
Swift, A., Webster, J., Conroy, A.M., Hampton, S., Kirby, S.J., Minuzzo, L. & Komble, R. (2014). Curved versus straight scissors to avoid 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears: a randomised feasibility study, Women Birth, 27(3), 163-167.
Weeks, J. D., & Kozak, L. J. (2001). Trends in the use of episiotomy in the United States:1980-1998, Birth, 28(3), 152-160.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
