OPPORTUNITIES FOR TREATMENT WITH A TEMPORARY OBTURATOR MADE OF THERMOPLASTIC FOIL

Ivan  Gerdzhikov

doi:10.35120/medisij020451g

Authors

Ivan Gerdzhikov Department of Prosthetic dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Sofia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij020451g

Keywords:

maxillary carcinoma, maxillary resection, maxillary defect, obturator, thermoplastic foil

Abstract

Prosthetic treatment with a temporary obturator is an intermediate stage in the overall prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with maxillary resection. According to prevailing opinions, treatment with a temporary obturator should start around 2 weeks to 2-3 months after resection and to continue until the final completion of the healing processes in the defect. Due to the dynamic changes in the defect, this treatment stage is associated with many difficulties, requiring frequent correction of the obturator and up to 12-14 clinical visits on average. The aim of the research is to track the opportunity for fabrication of a temporary obturator of thermoplastic foil with vacuum forming apparatus and its efficiency for restoring speech and fluid intake in patients with maxillary resection. For the aim of the study we conducted a treatment of a 45-year-old patient operated a week ago for maxillary carcinoma. As a result, the left alveolar bone and a part of the hard palate with a diameter of 10 mm were resected, with teeth 13 to 23, 16 and 17 preserved. The defect was padded with gauze and an impression with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material was taken. In the laboratory a grade 4 plaster working model was cast on which the borders of the palatal plate were outlined. For the frontal teeth, these were the cervical areas of the teeth, and for the distal - their equators. In the area of the defect and the missing teeth the border reached the transitional fold, and distally - the soft palate. The plate was made from foil of 1 mm diameter which was drawn onto the model with a vacuum forming apparatus and was cut along the indicated borders. The palatal plate - obturator successfully closed the comunication to the nasal cavity and restored the opportunity for fluid intake, which was the main problem for the patient. The use of a foil with a thickness of 1 mm provided stability and resistance of the construction. As a result of this, the necessary hermetic seal of the defect was achieved and the speech of the patient was normalised. The described treatment methodology with a temporary obturator allows the successful restoration of speech and fluid intake during the healing processes in the defect. The main advantages of the method are the fast and easy fabrication, the opportunity for multiple corrections and the short period of adaptation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Z. U., Flynn, J., Riedel, E. R., Huryn, J. M., & Rosen, E. B. (2020). Definitive maxillary obturator prosthesis: Timelines for fabrication and follow-up. Spec Care Dentist, 40(3), 315-319.

Aparna, G., Alexander, A., Sivaraman, G., & Kalaiarasi, R. (2022). Temporary obturator using high-density polyurethane foam following maxillectomy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Laryngol Otol, 136(2), 173-175.

Bettie, N. F. (2017). A Conservative Method of Retaining an Interim Obturator for a Total Maxillectomy Patient. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 9(1), 299-301.

Buzayan, M. M., Ariffin, Y. T., & Yunus N. (2013). Closed hollow bulb obturator--one-step fabrication: a clinical report. J Prosthodont, 22(7), 591-595.

Carl, W. (1976). Preoperative and immediate postoperative obturators. J. Prosthet. Dent, 36(3), 298-305.

Corsalini, M., Barile, G., Catapano, S., Ciocia, A., Casorelli, A., Siciliani, R., Di Venere, D., & Capodiferro S. (2021). Obturator Prosthesis Rehabilitation after Maxillectomy: Functional and Aesthetical Analysis in 25 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(23), 12524.

Da Silva, L., Ferros, I., & Rilo, B. (2004). New technologies, designs and materials for removable maxillary obturator prostheses. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol, 46(1), 27-35.

Devi, E. M., Gupta, C., Kochhar, K. P., Koli, D. K, Nanda, A., & Jain, V. (2022). A long-term nutritional assessment of maxillary cancer patients undergoing prosthodontic rehabilitation after surgery: A longitudinal study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 12(5), 702-708.

Haraguchi, M., Mukohyama, H & Taniguchi, H. (2006). A simple method of fabricating an interim obturator prosthesis by duplicating the existing teeth and palatal form. J. Prosthet. Dent, 95(6), 469-472.

Jehn, P., Spalthoff, S., Lentge, F., Zeller, A. N., Tavassol, F., Neuhaus, M. T., Eckstein, F. M., Krüskemper, G., Gellrich, N. C., & Korn, P. (2022). Postoperative quality of life and therapy-related impairments of oral cancer in relation to time-distance since treatment. J Cancer Surviv, 16(6), 1366-1378.

Mohamed, K., Subhiksha, R., & Preetha, K. (2021). Pre-emptive Designing of Immediate Surgical Obturator. Indian J Surg Oncol, 12(4), 745-749.

Ramasamy, T. V., & Chandra, J. (2020). An innovative sectional silicone obturator in a patient with partial maxillectomy: A Case report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 20(1), 115-119.

Rosen, E. B., Palin, C. L., Huryn, J. M., & Wong, R, J. (2019). The Role of Maxillofacial Prosthetics for the Surgically Treated Patient at National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Laryngoscope, 129(2), 409-414.

Sharaf, M. Y., Ibrahim, S. I., Eskander, A. E., & Shaker, A. F. (2018). Prosthetic versus surgical rehabilitation in patients with maxillary defect regarding the quality of life: systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 22(1), 1-11. Shimizu, H., Yoshida, K., Mori, N., & Takahashi, Y. (2009). An alternative procedure for fabricating a hollow interim obturator for a partial maxillectomy patient. J. Prosthodont, 18 (3), 276-278.

Yanamoto, S., Soutome, S., Murata, M., Kawakita, A., Yamaguchi, E., Yoshida, K., Kurogi, T., Kuroshima, S., Murata, H., Sawase, T., & Umeda, M. (2020). Efficacy of silicone soft reliner on the obturator prosthesis after maxillectomy for oral malignant tumors: A single-arm prospective interventional study. Clin Exp Dent Res, 6(6), 612-617.