EFFECTIVENESS OF PHYSIOTHERAPY FOR MUSCO-SKELETAL DISORDERS AND THE ROLE OF REMOTE PHYSIOTHERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij020445aKeywords:
physiotherapy, musco-skeletal disorders, remote physiotherapeutic’ e-healthAbstract
For patients with musculoskeletal diseases, physiotherapy is a safe and efficient treatment option that can help them manage their symptoms and enhance their health. In primary care, physiotherapists aid in the diagnosis, cure, and manage of a broad spectrum of acute and chronic disorders, as well as promote physical exercise, mobility, and function. Physiotherapists in basic medical teams maximize patients’ mobility in accordance with their lifelong needs. This brief study emphasizes the significance of musculoskeletal disorders treatable with physiotherapy. Physiotherapy interventions, when delivered remotely through e-Health platforms, have gained prominence as accessible and effective tools for managing musculoskeletal conditions. These interventions provide patients with valuable resources for self-management, while greatly used to improve everyones quality of life. At the same time, helping to moderate the challenges that this load can create on healthcare systems. The use of telehealth in physiotherapy offers opportunities for personalized care, continuous monitoring, and the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The relevancy of this approach is mainly noticed when put in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where the need for remote healthcare delivery has become paramount. Telehealth allows patients to receive timely care and support while adhering to social distancing guidelines. The concept of adherence to eHealth technology in physiotherapy is crucial for ensuring the success of remote interventions. Understanding when and how patients engage with eHealth platforms can guide the development of more effective interventions. It is essential to explore factors that influence patient adherence to technology-driven physiotherapy interventions to optimize their benefits. As healthcare systems worldwide face increasing demands, the implementation of remote physiotherapeutic e-Health interventions can help alleviate the burden by offering scalable and cost-effective solutions. These interventions have the potential to reach a broader patient population and improve access to care for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. The evaluation of the effectiveness of these remote interventions is essential to provide evidence-based guidance for their integration into clinical practice. By conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, researchers can contribute valuable insights into the outcomes and impact of telehealth-based physiotherapy on pain management and overall patient well-being.
Downloads
References
Alpay, L., van der Boog, P., & Dumaij, A. (2011). An empowerment-based approach to developing innovative e-health tools for self-management. Health Informatics Journal, 17(4), 247-255.
Barak, A., Klein, B., & Proudfoot, J. G. (2009). Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38(1), 4-17.
Briggs, A. M., et al. (2018). Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96(5), p. 366.
Childs, J. D., et al. (2005). A description of physical therapists' knowledge in managing musculoskeletal conditions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 6(1), 1-7.
Corso, M., et al. (2022). Are nonpharmacologic interventions delivered through synchronous telehealth as effective and safe as in-person interventions for the management of patients with nonacute musculoskeletal conditions? A systematic rapid review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 103(1), 145-154. e11.
Dueñas, M., et al. (2016). A review of chronic pain impact on patients, their social environment, and the health care system. Journal of Pain Research, 457-467.
De La Torre-Díez, I., et al. (2015). Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 21(2), 81-85.
Dario, A. B., et al. (2017). Effectiveness of telehealth-based interventions in the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. The Spine Journal, 17(9), 1342-1351.
Deyle, G. D., et al. (2020). Physical therapy versus glucocorticoid injection for osteoarthritis of the knee. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(15), 1420-1429.
de Rooij, M., et al. (2016). Prognosis of pain and physical functioning in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care & Research, 68(4), 481-492.
de Oliveira Lima, L., et al. (2021). Self-guided web-based pain education for people with musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Therapy, 101(10), pzab167.
Elbert, N. J., et al. (2014). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(4), e2790.
Gaskin, D. J., & Richard, P. (2012). The economic costs of pain in the United States. The Journal of Pain, 13(8), 715-724.
Ghai, B., Malhotra, N., & Bajwa, S. J. S. (2020). Telemedicine for chronic pain management during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 64(6), 456.
Hodges, P. W., & Smeets, R. J. (2015). Interaction between pain, movement, and physical activity: short-term benefits, long-term consequences, and targets for treatment. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 31(2), 97-107.
Hill, J. C., et al. (2008). A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology, 59(5), 632-641.
Hall, A. M., et al. (2010). The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Physical Therapy, 90(8), 1099-1110.
Kinross, P., et al. (2020). Rapidly increasing cumulative incidence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the European Union/European Economic Area and the United Kingdom, 1 January to 15 March 2020. Eurosurveillance, 25(11), 2000285.
Kloek, C. J., J. Janssen, and C. Veenhof (2020). Development of a checklist to assist physiotherapists in determination of patients' suitability for a blended treatment. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(8), 1051-1065.
Kloek, C., et al. (2017). Blended interventions to change behavior in patients with chronic somatic disorders: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(12), e418.
Miller, J., et al. (2010). Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Manual Therapy, 15(4), 334-354.
Moss, R. J., Süle, A., & Kohl, S. (2019). eHealth and mHealth. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 26(1), 57-58.
Roy, J.-S., et al. (2009). Impact of movement training on upper limb motor strategies in persons with shoulder impingement syndrome. BMC Sports Science, Medicine
Selçuk, A. A. (2019). A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 57(1), p.57.
Seron, P., et al. (2021). Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: A rapid overview. Physical Therapy, 101(6), p.53.
Sieverink, F., Kelders, S. M., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2017). Clarifying the concept of adherence to eHealth technology: Systematic review on when usage becomes adherence. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(12), e402.
Toonders, S. A., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of remote physiotherapeutic e-Health interventions on pain in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-19.
Vanti, C., Pillastrini, P., & Monticone, M. (2015). Management of musculoskeletal disorders with an emphasis on physical activity promotion and exercise prescription: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 8, 373-383.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Xhorxhina Alushaj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.