ADVANCES IN FOOT MEASUREMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR PHYSIOTHERAPEUTIC DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION

Kristian Stoychev

doi:10.35120/medisij0403047s

Authors

Kristian Stoychev NSA “Vasil Levski’’ – Sofia, Bulgaria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij0403047s

Keywords:

biomechanics, postural analysis, plantar pressure, physiotherapy, functional assessment.

Abstract

The human foot is a vital structure responsible for stability, balance, and efficient movement. Its anatomical complexity requires precise and reliable assessment methods, especially within physiotherapy practice. This study aims to present and analyze contemporary foot measurement techniques, including podometry, plantography, 3D scanning, baropodometric analysis, and functional testing. A comprehensive review of the scientific literature was conducted to evaluate the applicability, reliability, and clinical value of each method. The results demonstrate that digital technologies such as 3D scanning and baropodometry provide high accuracy and objectivity, while traditional techniques like podometry and plantography remain widely used due to their affordability and accessibility. Combining multiple methods enables comprehensive clinical evaluation. The choice of method should be guided by clinical objectives, resource availability, and the therapist’s expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, J. J., Munteanu, S. E., Bonanno, D. R., Buldt, A. K., Choppin, S., Bullas, A., & Pearce, N., Menz, H. B. (2023). Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: A scoping review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 16, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00617-z BioMed Central

Farhan, M., Wang, J. Z., Bray, P., Burns, J., & Cheng, T. L. (2021). Comparison of 3D scanning versus traditional methods of capturing foot and ankle morphology for the fabrication of orthoses: A systematic review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00442-8 BioMed Central

Farhan, M., Wang, J. Z., Warncke, R., Cheng, T. L., & Burns, J. (2024). Comparison of accuracy and speed between plaster casting, high-cost and low-cost 3D scanners to capture foot, ankle and lower leg morphology of children requiring ankle-foot orthoses. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 17(3), Article e70006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70006 PubMed

Jeong, B. O., Jeong, S. J., Park, K., Kim, B. H., Yim, S. V., & Kim, S. (2023). Effects of three-dimensional image-based insole for healthy volunteers: A pilot clinical trial. Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, 31(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e5 PubMed

Khandakar, A., Mahmud, S., Chowdhury, M. E. H., Reaz, M. B. I., Kiranyaz, S., Mahbub, Z. B., Ali, S. H. M., A Bakar, A. A., Alhatou, M., & AbdulMoniem, M. (2022). Design and implementation of a complete wearable smart insole solution to measure plantar pressure and temperature. [Preprint] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07779

Li, S., Chockalingam, N., Holder, A., Claypole, T., & Kilduff, L. (2023, September 1). Commercially available pressure sensors for sport and health applications: A comparative review. The Foot.

Olugbon, F., Ghoreishi, N., Huang, M.-C., Xu, W., & Chen, D. (2025). Reliable vertical ground reaction force estimation with smart insole during walking. [Preprint] arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.07748

Santos, V. M., Gomes, B. B., Neto, M. A., Rodrigues, P. F., & Amaro, A. M. (2025). A systematic review on smart insole prototypes: Development and optimization pathways. Actuators, 14(8), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/act14080408 MDPI

Shibuya, N., Agarwal, M. R., & Jupiter, D. C. (2024). A new paradigm in foot and ankle outcomes?: Away from radiographs and toward patient-centered outcomes. Clinical Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 41(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2023.06.013 PubMed

Willemstein, N., Sridar, S., van der Kooij, H., & Sadeghi, A. (2023). Soft insoles for estimating 3D ground reaction forces using 3D printed foam-like sensors. [Preprint] arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.04719